Errold F. Moody Jr.

PhD, MSFP, MBA, LLB, BSCE

Registered Investment Adviser 

Life and Disability Insurance Analyst

|Resume | Contact Me |Site Search  Home Page |  

401(K) PLANS

ARBITRATION and  LITIGATION

CHARITABLE STRATEGIES

COLLEGE PLANNING

ESTATE PLANNING

ETHICS

FINANCIAL PLANNING

INVESTMENTS

INSURANCE and ANNUITIES

LONG TERM CARE & AGING

REAL ESTATE

RETIREMENT

DAILY COMMENTARY FOR THE WEEK OF

May 11, 2008

 THESE COMMENTS AND WEB LINKS ARE OFFERED FOR A COUPLE WEEKS AND THEN DELETED. YOU HAVE TO COME HERE OFTEN TO BE SURE YOU GET ALL THE NEW STUFF SINCE I TEND TO UPDATE DAILY. (MOST OF THE LINKS ARE THEN ADDED TO OTHER PAGES ON MY SITE AND SOME OF THE COMMENTS MAY BE EXPANDED ON IN OTHER SECTIONS.)

ACCOLADES AND AWARDS

USA Today- "This is a high-powered personal bookmark list that spans the spectrum of the truly useful."

FORBES- "You'll find some great information."

BUSINESS WEEK: "For an Expert, Click here"  

AOL selected this site as an Editor's Pick for Financial Planning, Long Term Care, Insurance Information, Investment Professionals and more

Netscape selected this site as an Editor's Choice for Long Term Care, Securities, Consumer Protection, Financial Planning and Insurance, News and Information and more

Online Investor Sourcebook: One of the top Personal Finance sites on the Internet

Click to Buy Now!

Sample Pages

Book Review

No Nonsense Finance eBook

From a industry journalist: "It is wonderful - full of very sound advice, and in your typical no nonsense style, you've made sure the reader knows what is what. As usual, you have pulled no punches, and spared no illicit or immoral activity and/or schemes. Good for you. Investors need a healthy dose of reality, sans the sugar-coating."

Industry dialogue: From noted author Rick Ferri. "I GUARANTEE this book is worth every penny. For a little bit of insight into who E F Moody is, go to the widely acclaimed EFMoody.com website. You will not be disappointed."

From a reader: Errold Moody is unusually well qualified to write a book about financial planning. He enjoys more credentials than nearly anybody in the field. In my opinion, no one can be an expert in all the subjects covered. Mr. Moody comes as close as possible.

From a reader: I am studying for my MS in financial planning. I use information from your site to stimulate my appetite in contrast to the traditional texts used in the course. Your site and book rocks!

Yale: As stated, my book is not for industry. Generally, they don't like it since it shows a lot of the warts that exist. That said, others find it very useful. I acted as an expert witness on a major case.  One of the attorneys found it useful. He also had this to say: "I showed it to another expert of ours, David ........, who is a Yale professor. He thought it was great and said he was going to order a copy. And he is going to require it for his students."

From a reader: Thank you for writing the informative and refreshingly honest No-Nonsense Finance. Unfortunately, I found myself described amongst the pages as the uneducated investor who takes advice from a friend, hires a planner and a broker and loses 60% of her money. Ouch. Luckily, yours is the first publication that actually explains what went wrong and how to take more grounded steps going forward.  Your book (and website) have helped me begin to understand many important principles for prudent investing. Thank you again for your dedication to making Finance and Investing accessible for the rest of us.

From a reader: I am in middle of reading No Nonsense Finance and think it is one of the best financial books I have read to date. Due to watching my monthly statements continue to remain stagnant and the absence of any calls from my various brokers, I decided to take matters into my own hands and become my family's self-proclaimed CFO. First step was a financial plan from a CFP which turned out to be a 68 page piece of crap with relatively no validity or specific recommendations.

From a reader: Read part of Moody's book last night and this morning. Moody covers the 2000-2002 years so well and I really needed to see someone knowledgeable address it. You certainly never see anything in any magazines or from CFPs providing any real information.

From a reader: Your book arrived, wow, must say it has had a major impact on my perspective. As I read and absorb the information, I gain clarity on all levels.

My direction or approach has shifted, taking into consideration my own ignorance as well as the misleading information & handling of my funds. Understand the importance of being prepared to take responsibility for my own actions, along with taking time to gather information necessary to present my case in any forum.

Your book has become an important tool for me, confident I will gain satisfaction if presented properly.

Thank you for putting the information together in such a way that makes sense, especially when life doesn't!

From a reader- I picked up your book last year, read it, put it down and picked it back up during the last couple of months.  I would first like to say your writing is indeed hilarious and I have enjoyed every minute spent reading it. !

From a reader: I've read parts of your book & have been reviewing your web site & frankly ----WOW!!! What you are saying is beginning to open my eyes & making some sense to me , However it also struck fear in my heart -knowing how stupid I've have been all these years.

From a reader: I most especially enjoyed your tapes. I also bought your book and read it cover to cover. I have been profoundly enlightened. Thanks. I also share your cynicism and caution about getting financial advise.

Another reader: I purchased your book to investigate issues related to long term care and it was very helpful.

* Of course I am not going to print the couple responses from people who hated it. But I will tell you this- they wanted/expected me to provide the "exact" triggers that would tell you what, when and where to invest. If you want that, try Rich Dad/Poor Dad, or some other piece of sophomoric claptrap. Or ask some CFP, Suze Orman, whoever. None of them have ever been taught the risks of investing.

No Nonsense Finance was published in Chinese in 2005.  If it didn't make sense in English, try this.

Investment Malfeasance and Breach of Fiduciary Duty

A report describing the fallacies of knowledge and competency from planners to B/D Firms, attorneys and arbitrators. And absolutely for consumers

Factual and objective. It is based on this solid premise: If you do not understand diversification by the numbers, you cannot determine risk. If you cannot determine risk, you cannot determine suitability.

Human (Ir)rationality, Marketing, and Investment Sophistication 

A formal paper on why so many people do the wrong things with investing and are marketed to continue to do so 

Irrevocable Life Insurance Trusts and Trustee Fiduciary Duty

John Hancock ILIT Policy Analysis This is the real life analysis that is referenced above.

I have asked Errold Moody to provide a brief example of what he has actually found on behalf of a client who engaged his services to review the insurance contracts which funded the client's estate plan. You will be amazed. In my 30 years in the business, I have never seen an authoritative, objective, prudent expert speak so clearly on the use of insurance. What Errold can do is unique in the industry.

Steven Winks

5/8: Disability Insurance: only 58% of full-time employees say they have disability income insurance protection, according to the 6th annual MetLife Study of Employee Benefits Trends.  Nearly half of those, 41%, admit they don’t know how much protection they have.  The majority of working Americans (59%) have taken no steps to determine their households’ needs with regard to disability coverage.  For single people – who likely have only their own income to rely on – and young families – the majority of whom (59%) admit to living paycheck to paycheck – the loss of steady income can be especially devastating.

5/8: Flood insurance:  
Myth: Only homeowners can purchase flood insurance.
FACT: Most homeowners, condo unit owners, renters, and businesses in NFIP participating communities can purchase flood insurance. To find out if your community participates, go to www.floodsmart.gov or contact a community official or insurance agent. The maximum coverage amounts are:

Condominium unit owners: up to $250,000 in structural coverage and up to $100,000 in contents coverage
Renters: up to $100,000 in contents coverage
Businesses: up to $500,000 in commercial structural coverage and up to $500,000 in contents coverage
Myth: You can't buy flood insurance if you are located in a high-flood-risk area.
FACT: You can buy National Flood Insurance no matter where you live, as long as your community participates in the NFIP. The NFIP was created in 1968 to make federally backed flood insurance available to property owners, renters, and businesses in participating communities.

Myth: If you live in an unmapped area, you don't need flood insurance.
FACT: Even areas in unmapped flood zones are susceptible to flooding, although to varying degrees. If you live in a mapped flood zone, it is advisable to have flood insurance. However, between 20 and 25 percent of the NFIP's claims come from outside mapped flood zones. Residential and commercial property owners located in unmapped zones should ask their insurance agents if they are eligible for the Preferred Risk Policy, which provides very inexpensive flood insurance protection.

Myth: You can't buy flood insurance if your property has been flooded before.
FACT: You are still eligible to purchase a flood insurance policy after your home, condo, apartment, or business has been flooded, provided that your community is participating in the NFIP.

Myth: Homeowners insurance policies cover flooding.
FACT:  Unfortunately, many home and business owners do not find out until it is too late that their homeowners and business insurance policies do not cover flooding. The NFIP offers a separate policy that protects the single most important financial asset, which for most people is their home or business. Homeowners can include contents coverage in their NFIP policy. Residential and commercial renters can purchase flood insurance coverage for their buildings and contents/inventory and, by doing so, protect their livelihood.

Myth: Federal disaster assistance will pay for flood damage.
FACT: Before a community is eligible for disaster assistance, it must be declared a federal disaster area. Federal disaster assistance declarations are issued in fewer than 50 percent of flooding events. Furthermore, if you are uninsured and receive federal disaster assistance after a flood, you must purchase flood insurance to remain eligible for future disaster relief. Disaster assistance does not cover as much as flood insurance, and flood insurance claims can be paid very rapidly after the event.

Myth: You can't buy flood insurance immediately before or during a flood.
FACT: You can purchase National Flood Insurance at any time. There is usually a 30-day waiting period after you buy flood insurance before the policy is effective. In most cases, the policy does not cover a "loss in progress," which is defined as a loss occurring as of midnight on the first day your policy goes into effect. Basically, if you buy flood insurance after a flood, it will not cover your past losses, only losses after the policy goes into effect.

Myth: The NFIP does not offer basement coverage.
FACT: While basement improvements such as finished walls and floors, and personal belongings in a basement are not covered by flood insurance, structural elements and essential equipment within a basement are. The following items are covered under building coverage, as long as they are connected to a power source, if required, and installed in their functioning location:

Sump pumps
Well water tanks and pumps, cisterns, and the water in them
Oil tanks and the oil in them, natural gas tanks and the gas in them
Pumps and/or tanks used in conjunction with solar energy
Furnaces, water heaters, air conditioners, and heat pumps
Electrical junction and circuit breaker boxes and required utility connections
Foundation elements
Stairways, staircases, elevators, and dumbwaiters
Unpainted drywall walls and ceilings, including fiberglass insulation
Cleanup
More information on flood insurance is available on the Internet at www.floodsmart.gov, or by calling toll-free 1-888-275-6347 or TTY 1-800-427-5593 for the speech- and hearing-impaired.


5/7:  When Herding and Contrarianism Foster Market Efficiency : A Financial Trading Experiment
While herding has long been suspected to play a role in financial market booms and busts, theoretical analyses have struggled to identify conclusive causes for the effect. Recent theoretical work shows that informational herding is possible in a market with efficient asset prices if information is bi-polar, and contrarianism is possible with single-polar information. We present an experimental test for the validity of this theory, contrasting with all existing experiments where rational herding was theoretically impossible and subsequently not observed. Overall we observe that subjects generally behave according to theoretical predictions, yet the fit is lower for types who have the theoretical potential to herd. While herding is often not observed when predicted by theory, herding (sometimes irrational) does occur. Irrational contrarianism in particular leads observed prices to substantially differ from the efficient benchmark. Alternative models of behavior, such as risk aversion, loss aversion or error correction, either perform quite poorly or add little to our understanding.

5/7: Oil futures are now at $123/barrel.
Have you tried walking? bicycle?

Goldman Sachs say it could hit $200 by 2010.

The average consumer is screwed. Sure, one can say the rich corporations were at fault, the government, etc. Yes they have been at fault. But the consumer picked the politicians. They paid millions upon millions for sports jocks and limited payments for teachers. they have not done their homework and engaged in foolish activity with the Dotcom- then the real estate mess. There is effectively no way out. Once this mess is through, the government programs as Medicare and Social Security will bury us for a long long time. We will become a second tier country.

That's what happens when you don't do your homework (reading).

5/7: How the mighty have fallen- 

UBS AG, battered by $17.3 billion of first-quarter losses at its investment-banking unit, plans to cut 5,500 jobs and said clients withdrew a net $12.2 billion from its asset- and wealth-management divisions.

The headcount reductions, which amount to about 7 percent of the workforce, will include as many as 2,600 positions at the securities division,

But think of this. Some of the (supposed) best minds in the securities business lost almost $20 billion in one quarter. This is indicative of the basic financial acumen of this industry.

5/7: Arbitration case statistics  
Impress your neighbors, postman, dog.......

5/6: LIFE EXPECTANY CALCULATOR LINK

5/6: LIFE EXPECTANCY CALCULATOR LINK:

If they are different, why not add up and divide by 2.

* "The U.S. is in recession as I define it. "I would define that as a situation where people are doing less well than they were three months, six months or eight months earlier and most businesses find themselves in that position too
Warren Buffet

*
The United States has fallen into an "awfully pale recession" and may remain stagnant for the rest of the year,
Former FED Chairman Greenspan

5/5: PR Release:  PBS fluff, CPA crap, Financial Literacy 0

The California CPA Symposium on Financial Literacy, April 2008, focusing on teaching the young about investing, utilized a PBS video showing how a young black kid had made lots of money when he invested in Nike stock. Nice fluffy piece with him buying lots of Nike shoes, how he looked at the P/E ratio, looked to his mother for financial guidance and eliminated any other formal analysis. His “success” story was being played to lots of schools and finding an intense interest.

The problem is that any focus in that direction is effectively nothing more than gambling. I do not dismiss the fact that it will get students interested in making “thousands of dollars” with little effort other than looking at some stats (where they will be clueless), but this was so bad in professional instruction at any level that I sent this criticism.

Some of the readers might find this too polar. Sorry, the DOTcom was ‘critical’ and caused by a lack of study and insight (reading) and any basic financial literacy. The current credit mess is ‘critical’ and caused by a lack of study and insight (reading) and any basic financial literacy. Continuing that type of useless effort will lead our children into the same financial debacles over and over again.

John Larkin
Communications Director
California Society of CPAs
1235 Radio Road
Redwood City, CA 94065

RE: California Financial Literacy Summit

Dear Mr. Larkin,

Under no circumstances nor under any conditions is the video of the “Nike Kid” to be ever shown to anyone- certainly to a class of young students nor to the elderly as part of any effort for investment insight. That has to be one of the most egregious breaches of duty by an organization involved in education I have seen- and the worst of any professional entity.

I do not dismiss the effort for budgeting, credit card discipline, saving et al and almost anything in that direction should be applauded. However, I was appalled that anyone would have allowed the dissemination of material the violated one of the basic tenets of investing- diversification. And then it treaded further into other violations. A fluffy piece for television may be nice to induce an interest in investing but it is totally wrong footed. This is the type of trivia that was directly instrumental in the Dotcom mess and subsequently to the real estate debacle we now face.

This is not an ego trip. I have taught more varied classes in finance than anyone else- securities training, real estate and  insurance continuing education, university  classes for financial planning, etc.  My curriculum vitae is at http://www.efmoody.com. The site contains more than 4,000 pages of info that has been researched to address what people need to know to avoid the scams that others cause- and that they cause to themselves. But within that is the distinct research that the fundamentals of investing have never been taught to a broker. Alpha, beta, correlation, standard deviation, etc.- all the real elements of investing are not even touched upon in licensing training and never have been. Not in continuing education either. Worst yet is the risk exposure of the lack of diversification. It is not the superfluous commentary of “not putting all your eggs in one basket’ That has no statistical merit and is effectively useless in any legal arena- though repeated with regularity by those who have never studied the industry and are clueless to risk and reward. The question is, “how many stocks must you have in a portfolio in order to insulate it from unsystematic risk?” Or, more colloquially, “how many stocks to you need to have in a portfolio for it to be properly diversified?”

Unfortunately not one attendee apparently knew because they would now be writing with the same position and attitude that I am now taking. And as I have written for years, “if you do not know diversification you cannot determine risk. If you do not know risk you cannot determine suitability.”

At this point every reader has probably attempted some number to the above. Are you close? The minimum is at least 50 up to 350 stocks in a singular portfolio.  (Actually, the review has to cover correlation- a mind numbing and very intense issue in order to buy any stocks or bonds and to do any type of asset allocation.) For the purposes of those with limited background (certainly when instructing the complete novice) one chooses the higher limits- 350.  And when you get that far, you might as well use the S&P 500 or a Total Market Index fund. There is no way that any type of focus toward single issue securities should be considered. That Nike stock may have looked valid for a frivolous TV piece, but the risk of this position is 100 to 500 times greater than the market itself . No rational teacher would ever suggest such a ludicrous position. But that is if they knew of the problem. The symposium had a duty to be sure the correct information was imparted.

Here are the numbers that have to be researched at a minimum for Nike- http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/pdfiles/cfexams/Nikepres.pdf.
I defy literally anyone to interpret the numbers including David, his mother, the kids he teaches- AND the people who interviewed him.  If all it takes, per the video, is simply the  P/E ratio or  earnings per share, go ahead, give it a shot.  But you must address the viability of a singular position and as such you must consider this quote from Professor Benoit Mandlebrot, Professor of Mathematics at Yale University regarding the calculations necessary to figure out an element of risk-"First, as Markowitz himself pointed out, it is not certain that using the bell shaped curve is the best way to measure stock market risk; it is easy but not necessarily right. Second to build efficient portfolios, you need good forecasts of earnings, share prices, and volatility for thousands of stock. Otherwise garbage in, garbage out. Finally, for each stock, you must laboriously calculate its covariance with, or how it fluctuates against, every other stock. For a thirty stock portfolio, about the minimum needed to make the numbers work well, that means 495 different calculations of mean variance and covariance. For the entire NY Stock Exchange, 3.9 million calculations. And because prices change, the exercise needs constant repetition."
Now, any pundit of my commentary must have a statistical rationale that directly contradicts the above. (Clue- there isn’t any.) Why is an entire audience of people trying to help the young and elderly submitted material that is suggesting a risk up to  500 times that of the market overall.  Just what is the point of getting kids to save if you are sending them to Las Vegas ?

In separate discussion at lunch and the later round tables, no one knew what the risk was. A couple of women nodded their heads in agreement when I mentioned how wrong the video was. They indicated that it did not seem right but could not directly figure out the problem.  I approached Mr. Gallagher to ask for clarification.  He either was clueless to what was going on and/or didn’t care. Either way, it is indicative of the problem. Ms. Krueger was a broker- yet anyone who worked on this symposium HAD to have known that the fundamentals of investing have never been taught to a broker. That there was a PBS show, that Chatsky was with Oprah, what is your point? As CPAs, including PFS, you have a fiduciary duty to recognize what is being presented and whether it reflects a knowledge base of investing. That the fundamentals are not taught to brokers, consumers et. al., - is that not the point of a symposium to make sure they do the right thing?

This was- and is- an egregious fault on the developers to  initiate/perpetuate the foolish error of attempting to utilize single issue portfolios- or even those with two, three, four issues. An organization of this supposed quality, integrity and knowledge has fallen woefully short of its fiduciary obligation to PROFESSIONALLY INSTRUCT.  

I have no personal animosity to Gallagher or Krueger. But if you are going to have representatives for Financial Literacy expounding on how to approach investing, then they must be literate in the subject. You do not use a broker untrained in the fundamentals of investing nor someone else who says they don’t care to understand money. It may be considered acceptable for PBS fluff - it is not acceptable when our children and the elderly, in particular, are involved.   The developers of this symposium- who are touting their background and capabilities in investing- should have known better. Where was the insight? Where was the homework?

The above is factual commentary. There is no rationale to orient differently. Don’t put the most vulnerable in a position to be taken advantage of.

The following is a suggestion. It has been posted at my site for over 10 years and was requested for use by the Association for Investment Management and Research (providers of the CFA designation) in their licensing seminar (every attendee should be made aware of the background in securities analysis these entities have). It is somewhat flippant but it will help  anyone avoid about 90% of all scams and bad investments simply because of the  lack of knowledge base by the adviser.

“Never, NEVER, NEVER GIVE MONEY TO ANYONE UNLESS THEY HAVE AND CAN EFFECTIVELY UTILIZE A FINANCIAL CALCULATOR
If you or your adviser does not have and cannot use a financial calculator, then he/she does not understand money. You are committing financial/economic suicide when you entrust money to someone who doesn't know how it works.
Use of a financial calculator is NOT taught in traditional training classes to securities brokers, insurance agents, attorneys or many others who say they know money and investments. It is not even being offered as a basic continuing education course for securities or insurance agents. An attorney might have one for use as a door stop. It's certainly not taught to bank employees. It is taught to Certified Planners, ChFC's, CFA's, MBA's and the like but you must make sure they have stayed current in its use. Admittedly, computer programs can do some of the calculations (Quicken and the like), but the personal capability is mandatory if you don't want to get screwed.”
It is within that context that one of the best things to use for instructing students is the financial calculator. When dealing with budgeting and saving, a teacher can simply ask, for example, “if you wanted to buy a house in 10 years and were saving $200 a month, what would you have if you put it in a bank at 6%”. A few key strokes, 10 seconds and $32,940.
Or one could ask “if you went to a check cashing store to get money now for a $200 check from your uncle, how much are you going to pay?” It’s 12% in California so that is $24. The fees for all states are at http://www.fisca.org/CheckCashing%20Summary%2007%208.5x11.pdf. What about the set up fee of $10. Now what is the percentage you pay? A couple of key strokes and it is 17%.
What about advance loans. Here is the article from the Federal Trade Commission http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/consumer/alerts/alt060.shtm. The problem, quite obviously, is that no one is going to read this report- certainly not students. But a couple of keystrokes and a bit of commentary about savings will do it all in just a few minutes. For example the teacher asks “If you needed some money FAST, you can get a loan at an advance loan store. Say the amount was $100. You might pay $15 to get the $100. At the end of the 14 day loan you pay it off. What is your annual interest rate? 180%!
Say you could not pay it off then but needed to extend it another two weeks- for another $15. What are they charging you?” 360%! (I did not annualize the interest rate and I submit it is not necessary to make the point .)
Difficult for a teacher to do? Nope. A 15 minute video would allow even someone with no background in math the ability to do these numbers. It immediately helps students see what a real life example is by the person standing directly in front of them. Admittedly you can get far more involved with such a calculator, but it is unnecessary for the basics. Effectively anyone can do it- but all the calculators would have to be the same so that the video instruction would be identical. They probably can now be had for around $5 per calculator in bulk.
This is a great way to orient almost anyone to the value of budgeting and saving- or to put the fear of the financial gods in their minds and hopefully deter them- or their parents- from ever considering the use of products or services that violate common sense.

Lastly I did look at the brochures for teaching investments, including asset allocation, that were on display. Are you kidding me? Some of the charts were so convoluted I doubt I could understand them. If you want to teach this stuff correctly, avoid the issue of single issues altogether and provide a couple “simple” graphs on allocations for long periods of time. Does it work? Theoretically. Will it work for the future? Completely unknown. And that is what the students need to hear. What happened in the past can be a poor guideline to the future. But since the material needed to develop a proper allocation requires so much detail- particularly as regards correlation- there is effectively little one can do other than start them on something that has a possibility of producing returns over the long term, reducing risk and completely negating an attempt to buy individual stocks. For those pundits who think an allocation is so easy, certainly regarding the ability to determine correlation, I point them to http://www.fpanet.org/journal/articles/2007_Issues/upload/56354_1.pdf.  You either include this in total for a full orientation towards risk and reward (not a chance) or make it ‘simple’ by focusing on the fundamental principle of how an allocation “might” work. The instructors need to be careful here because of the inherent difficulties in mastering the statistics of risk and reward but they can suggest further readings on the subject for those who inquire- or allow another ‘course’ for those who have more interest and intellect.

In summary I had hoped the powers to be were going to provide accurate insight to the problem of investing. It did not happen nor do I believe that the parties had the requisite skills to do so. You need to reorient your efforts to real life entities that understand how investing is supposed to work. A broker, per se, is incapable of providing the insight. The fundamentals of investing have never been taught in any licensing course. The focus on single issues is rampant with excessive risk and should never be exposed to a novice. NEVER! The video is a terrible instructional presentation for the real world. I admit that it might get a young audience involved- but it is telling a story that is akin to gambling. If anyone wishes to dispute that they can do so- but only if they have a financial calculator in their hand. We can then really discuss risk.

A requirement to all is a minimum knowledge base is the ability to use a financial calculator. The basic ability to use this can be taught to almost any teacher in any area of the U.S. As such it brings to life the necessity of budgeting and savings and the ability to quickly see that the many supposed services to many are at interest rates that no one can absorb.

If you provide them the above info in a real life atmosphere where the teacher is directly involved, you can completely change the incorrect orientation to money. But if you continue the direction established, these students will be caught up in another DotCom or credit mess all over again.

I repeat, if you do not know diversification, you cannot determine risk. If you cannot determine risk you cannot determine suitability.  The Society has a duty to reorient it’s efforts to be sure the correct presentations are made.  

Very Truly,                                                    
Errold F. Moody Jr.

CC: All major contributors

See also: Investment Malfeasance And Breach Of Fiduciary Duty http://www.experts.com/showArticle.asp?id=184

I had such poor luck with women that I decided to try something else. I mean, really, look at the contentment.
By me at least.  The cow was drugged,
Then we went to McDonalds

5/4: Cost-effective Medical Treatment: Putting an Updated Dollar Value on Human Life
A thorny question lies at the heart of meaningful health care reform. How much is human life worth? New Wharton research based on Medicare kidney dialysis data shows that the average figure -- $129,090 per additional year of quality life -- is higher than prior studies have shown.

5/4: Have the mighty fallen?: No, but it gives pause to the use of risky investments unless you have a lot of money for backup (NY Times)  

Berkshire Hathaway, Warren E. Buffett’s investment company, said on Friday that first-quarter profit tumbled 64 percent because of losses tied to derivative contracts.

5/4: No, we ave not turned the corner:  The Census Bureau reported that 2.9 percent of homes intended for owner occupancy were vacant at the end of the first quarter, a number that before 2006 had never exceeded 2 percent.

Now that is just plain funny!

5/4: Alzheimers: By 2050 11 million to 16 million Americans will have the disease.

However, from VERY personal experience, do NOT believe you are coming down with the disease if you misplace your keys, cannot remember someone's name (perhaps you never liked them anyway, so what's the problem?). As you get older, you have more things to remember. If you are in a stressful job or, in particular, if you are attempting to do many things at the same time, you are effectively guaranteed to misplace stuff. With some of the reports I do, my brain is spinning and the effort to remember my keys, where I put the stamps, why I put my underwear on my cat- are all just "extra stuff" that means very little overall. I am doing too many things. Nothing to be concerned about. 

5/4: The American economy lost 20,000 jobs in April, the fourth consecutive month of decline, in what many economists took as powerful evidence that the United States is almost certainly now ensnared in a recession. But some are saying the loss was not as big as expected so things "are getting better". I do not think so. 


5/4: Know they customers"
Courts have uniformly held that there is no private right of action for violation of FINRA's (or those of any other self-regulatory organization) rules. However, certain rules, such as the "know your customer" or suitability rules essentially set forth the standard of care to which brokers and brokerage firms are held. As such, a purported violation of those rules would amount to negligence. For example, firms and brokers have a duty to "know your customer" and only recommend suitable investments. If they fail to do so, they could be said to have breached those duties. If that breach causes damages to the customer, then the firm or broker or both could be found negligent. Consequently, rather than being listed as separate independent causes of action, these allegations should properly be classified as a negligence claim. This may seem like a distinction without a difference, but actually it creates a slightly more difficult case for the customer. Why? Because it's inadequate for the customer to merely prove a rule violation. The customer must prove that the breach caused the damages.

5/4: Consumers are NOT spending:

Spending grew 0.1 percent in March when adjusted for inflation, after staying flat in February and recording a slight rise in January, the Commerce Department reported Thursday. At the end of last year, spending actually declined.

“What you’ve got here is a very dramatic consumer slowdown,” said Ian Shepherdson, chief United States economist at High Frequency Economics in London. “It’s much more severe than anything we saw in 2001,” he added, referring to the last recession.

Unadjusted consumer spending rose 0.4 percent in March, more than expected, but that figure does not take into account the immense price run-up in food and gasoline

Run, run I say!


5/4"I Bond Earnings Rate 4.84%, Fixed Rate 0.00%

The earnings rate for Series I Savings Bonds is a combination of a fixed rate, which applies for the life of the bond, and the semiannual inflation rate. The 4.84% earnings rate for I bonds bought from May through October 2008 will apply for their first six months after issue. The earnings rate combines a 0.00% fixed rate of return with the 4.84% annualized rate of inflation as measured by the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U). The fixed rate applies for the 30-year life of I bonds purchased during this six-month period. The CPI-U increased from 208.490 to 213.528 from September 2007 through March 2008, a six-month increase of 2.42%.

Bonds held less than five years are subject to a three-month interest penalty.

5/4:  LTC: The average annual price of a private U.S. nursing home room has increased to $76,460 this year, up 2% from the 2007 average.

The cost of a semiprivate nursing home rose 4%, to $68,408, while the cost of an hour of care from a non-skilled home health aide held steady at about $19. 

The hourly cost of care by a skilled, Medicare-certified provider increased 18%, to $38.

Adult day care cost about $59 per hour

5/4: BofA Investment to disgorge $10 million
Banc of America Investment Services failed to disclose to clients that it favored two mutual funds affiliated with them. 

5/4:  Life Insurance

Virtually guaranteed issue if your client can answer NO to the questions below.

A. Do you currently receive kidney dialysis or require oxygen use or have you been diagnosed as having a terminal illness?(Terminal illness is defined as any illness diagnosed that would reasonably be expected to cause death within twenty-four(24) months.)    Yes or No

B. Do you require assistance to eat, bathe, dress or take your own medication or are you currently confined to a hospital, nursing home, mental facility or Hospice or have you been hospitalized two or more times in the past twelve months?   Yes or No

C. Has the proposed insured ever been diagnosed as having or been treated for AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency

Syndrome) or ARC (AIDS Related Complex) by a member of the medical profession, or tested positive for HIV antibodies as part of a test conducted for the purpose of obtaining insurance?   Yes or No

Any question answered “Yes” in this section will disqualify the applicant for the Express Issue Whole Life Policy.

 

Policy Description Express Issue Whole Life

Issue ages 45-80

$2,000 Minimum - $50,000 Maximum

 

Graded Death Benefit in first 2 years Full face amount beginning 3rd year

First year return of premium plus 12%

Second year return of premium plus 24%

ADB included in first 2 years (full death benefit for accidental death)

 

Sample annual premium rates per thousand face amount*

 

Non Tobacco

Age                  45         50         55         60         65         70         75         80

Male     $          37.68    45.40    55.53    73.45    98.08    125.35  160.00  208.33             

Female $          31.40    37.06    44.43    57.59    75.45    98.31    128.02  166.67

Tobacco

Age                  45         50         55         60         65         70         75         80

Male     $          47.10    59.59    76.36    105.55  147.12  188.03  240.02  312.49 

Female $          39.25    48.64    61.09    82.79    113.16  147.48  192.01  250.00 

 

* Add $50.00 policy fee. Premium rates and/or availability of product may be changed without prior notice.


4/30: the Fed has cut interest rates by a combined 3.25% on seven occasions since September. I still don't think it will have the impact desired. Oil is still going up and I do not know where the top is.

*  “A computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any invention in
human history - with the possible exceptions of handguns and tequila.”

                                     -- Mitch Radcliffe

4/30: Yale Endowment



4/30: CHECK CASHING STATE LAW LINK

4/30: PAYDAY LOAN LINK

4/30: CORRELATION LINK:
High Correlations
These four relationships have been consistently strong:
1. The S&P 500 and large growth have had a long-term correlation of .96. Over rolling three-year periods, their correlations have been .90 or higher 100 percent of the time (Table 1 and Table 4, Panel 1).
2. Small blend and small growth have had a long-term correlation of .98. Over rolling three-year periods, their correlations have been .90 or higher 100 percent of the time (Table 1 and Table 4, Panel 8).
3. Large value and mid-value have had a long-term correlation of .96. Over rolling three-year periods, their correlations have been .90 or higher 100 percent of the time (Table 1 and Table 4, Panel 3).
4. Mid-blend and mid-growth have had a  long-term correlation of .93. Over rolling three-year periods, their correlations have been .90 or higher 93 percent of the time (Table 1 and Table 4, Panel 5). The author believes it is not helpful to invest in assets with similar return expectations and consistently strong correlations.
A better use of an investor’s risk budget is to invest in assets with lower correlations that still meet return objectives.
Low Correlations
Five assets have had low correlations to all the other assets in this study. Here is a summary of each:
1. Natural resources have had a correlation of less than .20 to all 17 other assets in this study, with the highest being just .19, for both small growth and small value. Natural resources have had the lowest average correlations—and the most consistently low correlations—to every asset in this study, including every category of stocks, bonds, and alternatives. Hence, natural resources have provided more diversification benefits than every other asset in this study. Of special note, natural resources have had a negative correlation 83 percent of the time to U.S. bonds, due to their inverse relationship to inflation.
2. Long-short has had an average correlation of .30 or less to all 17 other assets in this study, including negative correlations to all three U.S. growth styles, ranging from –.22 to –.33. Long-short has provided very strong risk-reduction benefits to all other assets, though it has had a mild association to value styles (high of .30 to large value) and real estate (.27).
3. U.S. bonds (the Lehman Brothers Government/Credit Index was used as the proxy for U.S. bonds) have had an average correlation of .30 or less to 15 of the 17 assets in this study, with the exceptions being mild connections to global bonds (.38) and cash (.34). U.S. bonds have had a very low correlation to all nine U.S. equity styles (ranging from .02 to .24), international stocks (.13), and emerging markets (–.06). But the correlation of U.S. bonds to U.S. equities has been less consistent than investors might expect, which will be discussed later in the study.
4. Global bonds have had an average correlation of .30 or less to 15 of the 17 assets in this study, with mild connections to international stocks (.44) and U.S. bonds (.38). Global bonds have had a negative relationship to all nine U.S. equity styles, with correlations ranging from –.03 to –.12. Interestingly, global bonds have had lower correlations and lower standard deviations in their correlations to U.S. equities than U.S. bonds. In other words, when mixed with U.S. equities, global bonds have provided more diversification benefits than U.S. bonds.
5. Cash has had an average correlation of .30 or less to 16 of the 17 assets in this study, with the exception being a mild relationship to U.S. bonds (.34).

4/30:

Four Asset Portfolio vs. S&P 500, 1972-2007

REITs, commodities, stocks, and bonds 

S&P 500- yellow

Inflation black

Four Asset- green

4/29: Asia is doing O.K.- for now: Japan's Nikkei briefly surpassed 14,000 for the first time in two months as Asian stock markets rose on the back of refreshed optimism about recently battered financial shares

4/29: Oil goes to $120 and the market goes UP. Dweebs

4/29: the FED will probably drop rates another .25%, but it will have to stop after that. Inflation is going up , up and UP.

*Ushers will eat latecomers.

in a church bulletin

4/29: Comments on Fiduciary to the NY Times

An investment adviser — also known as asset manager, wealth manager or portfolio manager — is a legal term that describes people who are in the business of giving advice about securities, stocks, bonds, mutual funds and annuities.
 
EFM- An investment adviser per se does not have a license for annuities. That is an insurance product.  
 
A minimum, say the experts, is a degree as a certified financial planner,
 
EFM- The CFP is NOT a degree. It is a designation only and reflects about one semester in money. Hardly adequate for anything except the most rudimentary info. A DEGREE in planning (MSFP) is far more encompassing. To my knowledge, the CFP Board provides no insight to those with a degree. 
 
Until I looked at the Financial Planning Association’s Web site (www.fpanet.org). It offers a recommended list of 23 documents to gather — from bank statements to check registers to insurance policies to stock options — once you’ve hired your planner.
 
EFM- Ah now here is the rub. A review of an insurance policy is mandatory. but if you do it for a fee- via Garret or NAPFA or whatever- it is illegal in about 35+ states. You have now violated the fiduciary standards to tell the truth and act in the clients best interests.
 
You have no idea what I am talking about I am sure. But you need to find out if you wish to be accurate to the consumer
 
Errold Moody

4/29: Houses: (Yahoo) Sales of new homes plunged in March to the lowest level in 16 1/2 years as housing slumped further at the start of the spring sales season. The median price of a new home in March, compared with a year ago, fell by the largest amount in nearly four decades. The Commerce Department reported Thursday that sales of new homes dropped by 8.5 percent last month to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 526,000 units, the slowest sales pace since October 1991. The median price of a home sold in March dropped by 13.3 percent compared with March 2007, the biggest year-over-year price decline since a 14.6 percent plunge in July 1970. The dismal news on new home sales followed earlier reports showing sales of existing homes fell by 2 percent in March. Housing, which boomed for five years, has been in a prolonged slump for the past two years with sales and home prices falling at especially sharp rates in formerly boom areas of the country

I can fly!!!!!

4/28: Financial Diet (Times)  In March, Americans spent less on women’s clothing (down 4.9 percent), furniture (3.1 percent), luxury goods (1.3 percent) and airline tickets (1.1 percent) compared with a year ago. 

4/28: Derivatives:  (Times)  Derivatives are privately negotiated and often complex financial contracts theoretically designed to limit risk. Their value is derived from an underlying basket of assets, like stocks, bonds or loans. Advocates say that derivatives, used wisely, foster economic activity. Critics contend that as derivatives trading has boomed over the last decade, it has led to high-octane speculation more akin to gambling than to sensible hedging of financial risk.

Once again I point readers to what should have been obvious. If the market is up or at least flat, many "theoretical" concepts will do just fine. But when situations finally hit, the theory may not work at all. Want validation? Long Term Capital. 27 PhDs and 2 Nobel Laureates had "theoretically" determined what to do under "any" financial conditions. Then  the world changed and the programs could not keep up. and a $6 billion bailout

4/28: DECEPTION AND LYING BEHAVIOR LINK-Attempts have been made to define what lying actually is and these definitions vary. On the whole they consist of the idea of a false communication that is to the benefit of the communicator. A number of reasons are given as to why people lie including to make a goodimpression, to avoid punitive action or for the purpose of gaining an advantage.

1) Defining deception or lying.
2) Why and when do people deceive or lie?
3) What are some of the individual differences in lying?
4) What are the types of deception (lying)?
5) How and why do children practice deception?

There is also the question of whether lying is always wrong and indeed it is not. Zeltzer (2003) emphasises the value of lying or not be totally honest in ones dealing with others as a form of lubrication of socialisation. Telling a white lie, or “therafibbing” can be of value.

The distinction between misinformation and disinformation becomes especially important in political editorials, and advertising contexts where deliberate efforts are made to mislead, deceive, or confuse an audience in order to promote personal, religious, or ideological objectives. The difference consists in having an agenda. This bears comparison with lying because ‘lies’ are assertion that are false, that are known to be false, and that are used with the intention to mislead (Fetzer, 2004). They are also meant to confuse. As already mentioned earlier, deceiving oneself can also culminate into the fear of deception. Barnes (2004) indicates that the term ‘lie’ has a broad range of meaning; like many other recent writers on lying, not all forms of deception are lying and it is cited that a dictionary definition of a lie is but one component of what is the 57intention to deceive; the other component being a statement that the liar believes to be untrue.

Lying is most likely to occur in those who adopt what is termed the “Machiavellian approach to life,” i.e. being opportunistic and adapting any kind of behaviour necessary to get what one seeks.

Participants reported telling their serious lies to get what they wanted or to do what they thought they were entitled to do, or to avoid punishment. Lies also occurred to protect oneself from confrontation, in an attempt to appear to be the type of person they wish they were, to protect others, and to hurt others. The degree to which the liars and the targets felt distressed about the lies differed significantly across these different types of lies. Similar results were obtained by Grover (1997) in an earlier study indicating that self interest was the major reason for deception or lying.

EXCEPTIONAL ARTICLE

4/28:  Peter Bernstein on the recent financial debacle (WSJ)  How long do you think this whole process will take, before we get back to normal?

Mr. Bernstein: Longer than people think. The people who think we will have turned in 2009 are wrong. There has to be a respite along the way. Nothing goes in one direction forever. But it will take longer than people think. If that weren't the case, I would be talking entirely differently. I would be saying, "What an opportunity we have got." And I just can't believe that the opportunity is here yet. There is too much to unwind.

WSJ: Can you explain the reason you think it will take a long time?

Mr. Bernstein: We have to go back to a moment when people have the courage to borrow and lenders have the courage to lend. Until credit is going up instead of down, you can't have growth. Housing has got to be a very important part of that; it always has been. You have to reach a point where somebody says, "This house is cheap, I am going to buy it," or where some businessman says, "This is a great opportunity for us to expand our business. Everything is available to us."

If China goes into a recession, God knows. The Iraq war and the whole situation with terrorism, we really don't know where that is going to come out. There are so many things that have got to get buttoned down before you say that the future looks good enough to take a risk.

4/27:  Home prices: Yale University economist Robert Shiller, pioneer of the widely watched Standard & Poor's/Case-Shiller home price index, said there is a good chance housing prices will fall further than the 30 percent drop in the Depression of the 1930s. Home prices nationwide already have dropped 15 percent since their peak in 2006, he said.

Home prices rose about 85 percent from 1997 to 2006 adjusted for inflation, the biggest national housing boom in U.S. history

4/27:  Told ya he was going to jail- A judge has just sentenced Wesley Snipes to three years in prison for tax evasion.

I don't think an appeal will work.

4/27:
*
1. The Prudent Investor Act requires ILIT Trustees to set expectations as to the performance of Trust-Owned Life Insurance (TOLI) holdings that are appropriate and reasonable in relation to the assets, the purposes of the trust, and the skills of the trustee. For the purposes of setting such reasonable expectations as to the performance of TOLI holdings, do you generally consider the rate of return on TOLI holdings to be ... (check only one)
My answer- Sorry- you have attempted to meld two functions- insurance and investments. The (almost universal) function is to provide insurance for estate taxes not for the internal cash value. As such one must first review pure insurance where the cash value is, generally, moot.

2. Section 7 of UPIA specifically requires ILIT Trustees to "only incur costs that are appropriate and reasonable in relation to the assets, the purposes of the trust, and the skills of the trustee". For the purposes of justifying policy expenses as reasonable and appropriate, do you generally consider the costs of a TOLI holding to be ... (check only one)

4. The duty to investigate seeks to ascertain the relative appropriateness of TOLI holdings as they relate to both the trust objective and peer group products (i.e., are expected earnings reasonable for the appropriate trust asset allocation and are TOLI expenses reasonable for the trust objective and relative to peer group product holdings?).

Please indicate below whether such investigation functions are being performed internally, or outsourced to a third-party, or are not currently in compliance:

6. The Prudent Investor Act makes no distinction in the standard of care between investment trusts and ILITs. As such, while it is common for trustees of investment trusts to use written Investment Policy Statements (IPS), which of the following do you currently have for your ILIT? (check only one):

4/27: Going down- The world's second largest advertising group reported underlying growth of 5 per cent, at the lower end of forecasts, as western Europe showed signs of a slowdown

4/27: CD: Do you know you can get a 6% FDIC CD for a minimum of one year. Sure beats and annuity both in fees and yields.

4/27: Retirement???
A new Wall Street Journal Online/Harris Interactive Personal Finance Poll finds that about one-quarter of adults who are actively planning for their retirement have prematurely withdrawn funds from their retirement investments. The most common reasons for premature withdrawals from retirement investment products include a family member losing a job and the cost of a down payment on a home. The report notes that financial pressures that motivate premature withdrawals seem to begin at age 35, when nearly one-third of respondents report doing so. Oh, and nearly one-third of adults who have prematurely withdrawn funds from their retirement products say they cannot pay them back

4/27: Tranches- (dick LePre)

The NYT has an interesting perspective on the mortgage mess. This piece looks at the mortgage mess and by implication blames the whole thing on Moody's and the other bond-rating services S&P and Fitch. I agree with the notion that only the debt-rating services could have stopped this. I do not agree that they alone created it or bear all of the blame.

The article looks at one particular pool of 2,293 subprime mortgages with a total amount of $430 million. Faced with the decision as to how to package and sell this pool of mortgages Moody's divided the bonds sold into 12 tiers and gave the lowest yields to the people who would get paid first and the highest yields to the bonds taking the biggest risk. These folks would be paid only after the other 11 sets were paid. In a perverse way this makes sense but the crux of the problem was that the model which Moody's used to evaluate risk failed. Wait. The model failed miserably.

What was wrong with Moody's model? I think that in fact the answer is very simple. There were two large mistakes. They seriously underestimated the effect that commingling stated income loans with fully documented loan had on foreclosure rates and the assumed that property values would keep rising. Constantly rinsing values allowed the inevitable to be delayed and when values stopped rising everyone got concerned.

Moody's and lenders may say "Well, poor us, we were the victims of a multitude of cases of loan loan fraud in which applicants overstated their income." That is a bad joke. I do not believe that Moody's or lenders were ever unaware of the extent to which stated income was overstated income. A Mortgage Asset Research Institute study that found 90 percent of stated-income borrowers reported incomes higher than those found on file with the Internal Revenue Service and almost 60 percent of the stated incomes were exaggerated by more than 50 percent. Moody's should have had a clue.

Stick a knife in my neck and I will shove a horn up your butt



4/27: Schwab: They are offering investors five cents to 12 cents on the dollar of the amount they lost by holding the Xtra yield bond fund, whose net asset value has plummeted in recent months

4/27:  130/30 Funds and Long Short: The numbers are a description of what these funds do. While percentages can vary, a 130/30 fund invests 130% of its assets in "long positions”—stocks where the manager is betting the price is going up—and 30% in short positions, where the expectation is that the price will go down. In a short sale, the seller borrows stock and sells it on the open market, getting the cash from the sale. If the stock's price falls, the investor buys back the shares at the lower price, returns them and pockets the difference.
    The proceeds from those short sales create the extra 30% of long exposure. On a net basis, the extra long and the short position cancel out and the fund can claim to simply  be "fully invested." For the average investor, however, the effect feels similar to a fund that uses leverage; the extra investment is there, theoretically, to turbocharge returns.

I watched these years ago. the theory is sound- but it involves the human element in determining what to buy long AS WELL AS what to short. The returns have been unspectacular at best. One heavy hitter (Barra) when asked what the problem was said "the market didn't react as it was supposed to do." Say what????

0

How I really make my money

4/23:  The tax extenders bill includes six provisions that are of great importance to philanthropy. These provisions would be effective from January 1, 2008 until December 1, 2009. The six provisions are:

1. IRA Rollovers -- IRA owners over age 70? may transfer tax-free up to $100,000 directly to qualified charities.

2. Conservation Gifts -- The appreciated property limit is raised to 50% (100% for qualified farmers and ranchers) and the carry-forward is extended to 15 years.

3. Gifts of "Apparently Wholesome Food" -- The charitable deduction is increased to the lesser of twice the basis or basis plus half of appreciation.

4. S Corporation Gifts -- Gifts of appreciated property by S Corporations have more favorable basis rules.

5. Gifts of Book Inventory -- An enhanced deduction is available for publishers making gifts of books to schools.

6. Payments to Charities by For-Profit Subsidiaries -- Payments for items such as rent will not be unrelated business income if the payment is at fair market value.

4/23: Groups React To FINRA VA Rule Delay
Insurance industry groups are welcoming an announcement that the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority has delayed indefinitely implementation of parts of its new variable annuity marketing rule because it plans to propose amendments to the controversial provisions in the near future.

Nothing like delays and procrastination to help the public

4/23: Oil- Crude oil rose to a record $119.90 a barrel in New York as the dollar dropped to an all-time low against the euro.

Readers will note that I said $4 gasoline by this summer quite some time ago. Well maybe $4.25- even $4.50. Unless interest rates RISE the dollar goes lower and the price of oil goes higher.

4/23:  Applicable Federal Rate of 3.2% for May -- Rev. Rul. 2008-24; 2008-18 IRB 1 (18 Apr. 2008)

The IRS has announced the Applicable Federal Rate (AFR) for May of 2008. The AFR under Sec. 7520 for the month of May will be 3.2%. The rates for April of 3.4% or March of 3.6% also may be used. The highest AFR is beneficial for charitable deductions of remainder interests. The lowest AFR is best for lead trusts and life estate reserved agreements. With a gift annuity, if the annuitant desires greater tax-free payments, the lowest AFR is preferable. During 2008, pooled income funds in existence less than three tax years must use a 4.8% deemed rate of return.

4/23: Designations?: The NAIC  insurer and producer bulletin applies to the marketing and sales of fixed and variable life insurance and annuities and requires the proper use of designations by producers. The bulletin also notes that insurance companies are responsible for the advertising of their products whether by the company or producer, and designations are part of such advertisements.

And, it states that “any producer who advertises himself or herself as holding special status due to training or advanced education must provide documentation of expertise, such as a course syllabus and proof of successful completion of the course of study or training.”

EFM- Still won't work. Who is going to review the syllabus and will they know what is needed? Very doubtful. A minimum standard is the use of a finanical calculator- and no state requries that .  

Why I am no longer allowed at the beach

4/22: Hit and miss??:  (Times) CONVENTIONAL wisdom recommends that investors start with a high allocation of stock in their portfolios when they are young and reduce it as they approach retirement.

But a recent study of real-world portfolio returns, which fluctuate significantly from month to month and year to year, has found that there is no particular advantage in this approach. You would do just as well, with no greater odds of doing poorly, by simply picking an allocation of stocks and bonds that you can live with for a long while and sticking with it.

The professors performed elaborate computer simulations for hypothetical individuals investing for retirement. Each earner is 35 years old and trying to amass $1 million (in 2006 dollars) by age 65, in 30 years’ time. They differ in how they divide their portfolios between stocks and bonds.

They also differ in how the stock and bond markets perform during their decades of investing. For each year and individual, the professors picked randomly from the 80 years from 1926 to 2006. That means, for example, that the period over which an investor is trying to amass wealth could turn out to be like the 30 years beginning in 1929, a period when the market barely beat inflation — or like the 30 years beginning in 1974, a span when stocks provided stellar returns.

By running their simulations thousands of times, and by assuming the future will be like the past, the professors calculated the odds that any given strategy would succeed. Consider, for example, an investor whose portfolio at age 35 has 78 percent allocated to stocks and 22 percent to bonds, and that the equity portion declines gradually so that, at age 65, it is just 40 percent.

Such a scheme is typical of what many financial planners recommend, and is similar to what has been adopted by the so-called life-cycle funds, or target date maturity funds, that mutual fund families in recent years have created. Assume further that this investor contributes $11,000 each year to this portfolio. This would be enough to enable it to reach $1 million by the time he is 65 — provided the stock and bond markets each year perform exactly in line with their long-term averages.

Yearly returns aren’t the same as the long-term averages, though. Based on actual market returns, what are the odds that this investor will succeed? The professors calculate them to be quite low — only 29 percent. Furthermore, the odds aren’t that high that this investor will even get close: the probability of his portfolio being worth at least $750,000, or 75 percent of his goal, is just 62 percent.

4/22:  BofA woes: BofA takes $1.9 billion in write-downs
Bank of America Corp. reported a 77% decline in first-quarter earnings, to $1.21 billion, or $0.23 cents a share

4/21: Scotland has woes too: The Royal Bank of Scotland is planning to raise significantly its target for capital reserves as the lender responds to growing pressure from regulators and investors for banks to hold more capital. Wanna guess why?

4/21: Excuses excuses. Europe's biggest casualty of the subprime crisis explained how its elaborate risk detection procedures failed to detect that it had built up more than $70bn in potentially dangerous positions.

It's one thing to say you picked a fund that did not work. It's another thing for an entire corporation to state it did not have anyone at the helm- all the way to the boileroom- that had any idea that the ship was heading right into a reef. I once again point to Long Term Capital- 27 PhDs and 2 Nobel Laureates that  could not set up programs that took into account the volatility of the human element. 

In essence if you have a flat economy/market where there are NO extremes most programs will work, albeit still with certain uncertainties. It is the extremes that cannot be accounted for that needs to be addressed INITIALLY and a method to deal with them once the situation happens. However, the male ego (yes, that is exactly what I mean) does not allow most humans to see what what they had done was not working and to do anything to avoid a calamity. So it is "stay the course". 

So we had the DotCom. And we have the credit mess. And we have huge deficits. And Congress wanting to reduce taxes some more. Won't work.

Creepy

4/20: Merrill bleeds billions, cuts 3,000 jobs
Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. reported a first-quarter loss of $2 billion, or $2.19 per share - its third consecutive quarterly loss

Ah, but remember what their CEO said last July. 'We're merrill Lynch and we know how to manage risk." 

Bite  me

4/20: Growing like rabbits (Times)  

From 1980 to 2004, the assets of stock funds increased 90 times, from $45 billion to $4 trillion. During that same period, fees paid by investors and collected by fund managers via fund management companies soared from $288 million to $37 billion. What’s more, the fund managers received their fees regardless of whether the prices of the stocks they selected went up or down.

Not surprisingly, mutual funds continue to multiply like rabbits. By the beginning of 2007, there were about 4,800 mutual funds with $6 trillion invested in stocks and $3 trillion more invested in bonds and money market funds.

The mutual fund industry offers 11,000 different asset classes, ranging from high-tech to old economy stocks that are sold to investors “like soap.” But rather than dealing directly with the public, mutual funds amass up to 90 percent of their money through retail brokerage firms, which, in turn, enjoy “pay to play” revenue-sharing arrangements. In 2005, for example, the Edward Jones brokerage firm collected a whopping $172 million from a favored seven mutual fund groups to which it had referred its retail clients.

The average mutual fund holds 160 stocks

4/20: Going to college?? (Times)  Traditional and even nontraditional sources of college financing are suddenly in question. Dozens of companies that once provided billions of dollars in student loans have left the market. Other banks are tightening their standards, making student loans harder to get.

4/20; I spoke with a friend of mine that moved to Oregon about 10 years ago for a better life- at least to beat the San Diego traffic (HORRID!!) But his wife got early onset Alzheimers at age 51. She is now in a wheelchair and is essentially incommunicado. He is still taking care of her at home but he is also going downhill. Caregivers have to watch out for themselves. I think he will have to institutionalize her soon if just to retain some of his on sanity. 

My mother has been institutionalized for over 10 years. She remembers nothing. 

Lousy way to die. 

4/20: Citigroup Records a Loss and Plans 9,000 Layoffs  

So what happens? Investors think that is a good thing and push the market up.

4/20:  As readers might remember I am a trustee for a client who died in Riverside. It's one of the worst areas in the U.S. for real estate foreclosures- though this house is in a fine neighborhood and looks like a model home. but the last sale went puff because the buyer could not get financing. I knew it would be tough but I had hoped to avoid a listing. The property was appraised for $445 in January. I "sold" it for $425. Probably cannot